What Does Freedom Mean to You?

Freedom, by definition, is the power to act or freedom to change without restraint. Something being “free” is if it’s not restricted in its current state and can change as easily as the circumstances allow. In a sense, freedom is the foundation of all civilisations; a free society allows people to live their lives without fear of societal punishment.

So what do we mean by freedom? To most people, freedom means different things to different people. The dictionary might describe it as individual freedom, personal autonomy, personal or individual rights, individualism, or an absence of centralized rule. In popular use, freedom is often associated with political freedom, an abstract notion of freedom where people are allowed to think, speak, and behave as they choose.

In political terms, freedom is a value that gives citizens the right to participate in the political process, to protect their rights, and to seek a fair trial. In the political world, however, freedom has many different meaning. For many different types of government, freedom of speech and freedom of the press are essential rights. The right to bear arms also protects many different groups of people, even when they are not a part of a formal military.

When you ask what does freedom mean to you, consider what it means to you personally. Do you see freedom as an abstraction, something you only wish you had because you think it would improve your life? Or do you see freedom as the basis of all human potential, the belief that all men are created equal and that no one can be placed in a place of authority over another for any reason? If you believe strongly in both of these ideas, you may have a very particular definition of freedom.

To some, freedom might mean religious freedoms, the right to choose your own religion, freedom of speech and press, and protection from tyranny or oppression by the majority. To others, freedoms are essential parts of a just and peaceful society. These two minutes will look closely at each of these ideas so that you can develop your own unique opinion of what freedom means to you.

In the United States, freedom means freedom of choice and the ability to pursue happiness as you see fit. In the United Kingdom, freedom means the right to vote and freedom means the right to an education. In Canada, freedom means the right to privacy and freedom means the right to be left alone. Look closely at each of these definitions of freedom and consider what it means to you.

democratization Process in Indonesia

Democracy in Indonesia is threatened by recent events in neighboring countries such as Thailand and the Philippines. The two Southeast Asian countries are locked in a fierce struggle for political control, with each nation’s military dictatorship having control of large swaths of land. In fact, since Indonesian forces allied with those from the Philippines and Thailand invaded those countries in East Timor, has taken control of the whole island, except for South Timor. This has caused severe turmoil in South-East Asia, with thousands killed and displaced.

There has been a steady deterioration in the quality of life for the Indonesian people, who have become disillusioned by their own government’s inability to solve its massive political crisis. International human rights organizations have consistently called on the new leadership to end impunity and take firm steps towards democratic transition and free elections in Indonesia. The current chairperson of the UN General Assembly, Kofi Annan, has publicly stated that he believes that “the restoration of peace and stability in Indonesia will depend largely on the new government and the emergence of multiparty politics”.

The current situation is highly charged and dangerous, given the lack of a stable and inclusive political system. Although the Aceh (Indonesian name for East Java) Province was included within the former Aceh Peace and Order (PAO) in 1997, it is presently part of the West Java Province. Both provinces are rebellious regions with serious problems such as inadequate education, poverty and an ineffective judicial system. The new system of governance will be based on a participative proportional representation system, which will ensure fair and competitive national election. In this way, the people will be able to exercise their right to vote and choose leaders through a transparent and free election.

The transition to democracy in Indonesia will be facilitated by the establishment of a constitutional monarchy, rather than a constitutional republic, as was the case with the previous Aceh governments. This will enable the transition to democracy to proceed smoothly, and there will be a transfer of power from the military to a civilian office. A new constitution will be drafted and published to guide the constitutionality of the new democratic government. In addition, constitutional amendments will be incorporated to upgrade the protection of human rights and freedoms guaranteed by the universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international instruments.

The new constitution will also allocate seats in the House of Representatives and the Senate to the people living in each of the provincial and prefect areas. The president will be elected by the national assembly after being confirmed by the lower house. If the upper house finds that the president is unfit to lead, the vice president will act as president until a new vice president is elected. Jokowi was not sworn in as president until after his vice president had been chosen and was confirmed by the Senate.

For some analysts, the transition to democracy in Indonesia will be a smooth process with the new system of government providing the needed checks and balances to protect the citizens’ rights. There have been calls by some groups of Indonesian citizens for a revolution but most analysts agree that the chances of widespread social unrest are slim. The transition to democracy in Indonesia will be a slow, steady process, marked by transition, and yet again, transition.

The Problem With Direct Democracy

Why is it important to learn about democracy? Well, one of its most important attributes is freedom of choice. democracy is a political system in which the citizens have the right to deliberate and chose governmental leaders, or the legislature, to perform or oversee legislation. In a democracy, citizens have a right to an fair and impartial hearing before their elected representatives make decisions. They have a right to be free of abuse and free from undue influence from special interest groups.

Without having a fair election process, it is not possible for any political party to win an election and become a major party in the political arena. Consequently, in most cases, parties that win most of the votes in an election still maintain a minority of seats in the legislature or the executive office. This can occur because the party with the most votes does not have a majority of seats in the legislature or the executive office, leaving them with a minority. Another reason why some political parties cannot gain enough votes to win an election is because many citizens are backing a more popular party than they do their own party. Regardless of how many seats each political party wins, they usually form a majority in most national and state governments.

Underlying all of this is the freedom of citizens to vote, and this allows individuals to determine what political parties they want to support. The ability of citizens to vote ensures that government officials are accountable to the citizens who elect them. Without a majority rule, it is impossible for a politician to effectively serve the needs of the majority of citizens. Without election results that reflect the will of the majority of citizens, a politician cannot rightfully claim to be representative of all citizens. This lack of election results is what is often referred to as democracy, or mob rule. Without a free and fair election process, a democracy is nothing more than a sham.

Unfortunately, many of those who call themselves partiers have a clear intent to manipulate the outcome of democracy in their favor. Many political parties will use their influence among citizens to sway the voting populace to their favor. Often times, they will bribe citizens with food, money or other bribes in order to get them to change their vote. This conduct goes on continually in countries all over the world with citizens believing that they have a right to be governed according to their individual will.

A representative democracy is not without its flaws, although Athens has been described as the perfect city. It is unfortunate that a society that developed out of a democracy such as Athens has allowed for the rise of such cronyism and corruption. Some would argue that Venice is the perfect example of direct democracy, as Venice was a direct democracy until the nineteenth century. However, both Athens and Venice were founded on the basis of an Ancient Greek polity known as aristocratic citizenship.

Direct democracy is inherently defective, because individuals have no say in determining the fate of any political party. Without political parties being accountable to the citizens that Elected them, it becomes possible for them to do anything they want, which ends up skewing the goals of the societies that elect them. For this reason, all forms of democracy are inherently flawed. However, even with these flaws democracy can work well if the direction it sets forth is one that benefits humanity as a whole.

democracy In America – The Real Problem And How To Fix It

The term democracy in America has recently been in the news for all the wrong reasons, and for very good reasons too. A certain breed of Americans who think they know what democracy is should probably have their heads cut off, because this form of government is anything but democratic. Unfortunately the leadership of our country has not learned how to speak the language of democracy, and so we have the unfortunate situation of American style democracy in America where the elected leaders, the legislature, and the popular vote do nothing.

The phrase democracy in America is commonly misused by academics and politicians alike, sometimes using it to compare the United States with Europe or with some third world countries, when in fact the twenty-first century version of the American system of government is much different than any other nation in the world. The most accurate comparison that one can draw between today’s America and any other place in the world, other than perhaps China, is that there is an extremely high degree of individual freedom in America, the highest degree in the world. This means that citizens can choose which laws they live by, which they cannot, and which they have no say over whatsoever. Without having to worry about being ruled by an iron hand, without fear of taxation or arbitrary rule by an autocratic regime, American citizens enjoy freedoms so wide-ranging that nearly every other country on earth can be compared to America.

But is all of this really true? Is America the shining example of a healthy democracy, or is it just a bunch of spoiled, decadent, weak-minded, self-centered, and selfish babies crying out for a better life who need to be coaxed, cajoled, or lectured into accepting something other than the current golden egg: the industrial age. Well, if you’re anything like me, and you know the answer to this question, you’re too smart to be fooled by anyone whose answer you hear. No matter how hard they try, no matter how slick they make themselves, no matter how arrogant they purport to be, no matter how much they whine and how little they achieve, the reality is that democracy and free markets don’t mix well.

The problem with America’s political system has nothing do with America; it has everything to do with the flaws of our political system. It is nothing unique to America. It is something all humans do to some extent. For instance, if we lived in a strictly merit-based society, with no ethnic, national, or linguistic barriers, then everyone who applied for the most top level positions would automatically be eligible for them based solely on their merits. If we instead had a merit-based political system in America and everyone had the same opportunities as everybody else, then somebody with more merit and ability would be left over and that person would be more likely to become a successful entrepreneur and/or leader, because he would have more competition. And that’s exactly what has happened in America – lots of top level jobs have gone to highly qualified CEOs thanks to an almost foolproof merit-based process.

The funny thing is, all this is taking place in an increasingly “meritocratic” (to use an adjective that describes something arbitrarily selected) and democratic (to use an adjective that describes a government characterized by wide ranging and liberalized opportunities) country. One can only imagine the level of liberalism and cultural relativism that will prevail when Hugo Chavez becomes president of Venezuela and allows his people to freely select from a menu of economic goodies that are designed to keep their poor country in poverty. That would be quite ironic, since Hugo Chavez is claiming to want to bring democracy and freedom to his poor country. The fact is that Hugo Chavez will never have his people participate in those things, because their fates are sealed. For them, democracy and freedom means living in extreme poverty and suffering terrible consequences.

It is unfortunate that the people calling themselves the champions of democracy and freedom have abandoned the principles that allowed them to flourish as a bulwark against aristocracy. Instead they advocate a form of social Darwinism in which the survival of the fittest rules. Apparently the aristocracy is no longer extinct in America and, thus, the Democratic Party has little to offer the disenchanted masses in its bid to win back the lost Obama-Fournier base. There is a time for political equality and a time for aristocracy. I hope someone else reminds me of that.

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and Its Role in Our Criminal Justice System

The law is law made and enforced by governmental or civic bodies to regulate conduct, having its exact definition often a question of longstanding debate. It’s been differentially defined as the craft and science of civil law. Historically, civil law dealt with disputes between individuals or associations, such as corporations and government departments. Today, however, civil law also includes crimes, offenses against the state, private rights, and corporate matters. Private citizens can have their rights protected under civil law as well as government officials and/or officers of higher rank.

Civil law emanates from the rules governing the relationships between persons and society at large. The societal aspects of civil law often extend beyond the individual. Common law is the body of law developed by the courts over the course of time in response to the problems faced by contemporary society. The common law arises from three sources. These sources include the traditions of society, common law that emerged in societies after societies formed; and legal theories that developed out of these traditions.

The common law has developed through time in response to accommodate the increasing complexity of modern life. These laws attempt to provide a long description of the ways in which people interact with each other and with society as a whole. This is done by developing a body of laws that are commonly referred to as “norms of conduct”.

Civil law involves the rules governing disputes between individuals, organizations, and governments. Each person involved in any dispute has the same set of legal rights and responsibilities. But different institutions have different responsibilities and rules in relation to how they deal with those duties. When a dispute arises, whether it’s between businesses or individuals, a lawyer is often called upon to determine who has more legitimate standing and is capable of resolving the dispute in a fair and reasonable manner. These decisions are generally guided by a set of legal principles known as “laws of contract” and “acts ofarreavement”.

Another branch of law is criminal law. Criminal law involves the punishments inflicted upon people for crime. It also involves the punishment inflicted upon those who committed crimes in the past as well as those who are presently engaged in criminal activities. Many lawyers become involved in criminal law after graduating from high school or college, as many jurisdictions require aspiring lawyers to take and pass an ethics exam prior to practicing.

Justicary law involves the investigation and determination of crimes and their punishments. This branch of law is the most complex, because there is a great degree of deference given to the wishes of the courts when it comes to interpreting what crimes are not crimes. This can be a very complicated and demanding area of the legal system. In some areas, the federal government alone is empowered to appoint judges, and they are obliged to respect the decisions of the courts even if they believe there are strong public arguments against their decisions. A number of states also appoint several supreme court judges, and they are all required to obey the decisions of the courts unless they consider themselves beyond the reach of the state supreme court.

Politics, Sectarian Campaign, And Social Fabric In Indonesia In The Next Phase

Democracy in Indonesia is defined as government by the people and for the people. The basic unit of government is the constitution which is voted for and accepted by a majority of inhabitants within a nation. A constitution is not a written document but rather a set of rules or laws that define the relationship and standing of the nation, its government, and its citizens. This document is then put to test whenever an event occurs that may require changes to it. For example, if a candidate for national office promises to modify or abolish a particular law, a constitutional amendment is required to make that happen.

democracy in Indonesia is seen in the constitution and political system as a representative form of representative government. The presidential office is divided into two types of offices: the president himself/ herself and vice-president. The head of the National Bank of Indonesia also acts as a presidential candidate for presidential elections in 2021. The system of checks and balances ensures that no one person has the power to abuse the power of the other. A major concern for many Indonesian citizens is the increasing level of social polarization in society. Some worry that social polarization will lead to increased instability and insecurity in the country.

The rise of hardline groups, such as the Islamic revivalists and the hardline groups associated with the Golkut religion have exacerbated the problem of increasing polarization in Indonesia. Political analysts forecast that these groups will lead to more political instability in Indonesia in coming years. The rising Islamism in Indonesia has also contributed to increase in intolerance and discrimination against the Ahmadiyya community and other non Jakartaese, due to their traditional religious beliefs. There are reports of violence against Ahmadiyya and Christian communities in Aceh province in Indonesia. Aceh has been plagued by conflict since 2021 when it became part of Indonesia. Violence against the Ahmadiyya community, Christians, Muslims, Chinese and foreigners have displaced hundreds of thousands from the region.

Recent months have seen a significant increase in violent attacks against minorities in Aceh, including Christians and Buddhists. There are also reports of forced disappearances and abuses against Chinese in Aceh. The Indonesian government has promised to address issues of social media incitement and violence against minorities during the past few weeks, but this promise has yet to materialize. The escalating number of skirmishes between hardline groups and local residents in Aceh further exacerbates the problem of increasing polarization in Indonesia. This will further deteriorate the country’s ability to fulfill its democratic path.

There is no doubt that Indonesia is experiencing a historic stage of great change. democracy will become the ruling party’s main political platform in running the country. The current government has failed to live up to its inclusive vision for the nation. There are serious concerns on the horizon, especially in terms of the upcoming 2021 election, when the governing party is expected to once again seek the support of the Islamic groups to further marginalize the Balinese and Chinese communities in areas like northern Aceh.

Ethnic Cleansing In Aceh: As the ethnic Chinese vote for a boycott in the upcoming elections, there will be further incursions by the hardline Islamic movements into other parts of Aceh to push them into the sea. The northeast has already been heavily affected by recent ethnic cleansing. Although the government has declared a cease-fire in many fighting areas, many people fear that the conflict will worsen and transform into a sectarian campaign. If ethnic cleansing is happening in Aceh, it is likely that the province will be even more devastated than before. For this reason, the prospect of a peaceful, fair, and multiparty election in Indonesia in next year is very doubtful.

The Demise Of Democracy In America And The Need For A People’s Revolt

The democracy concept has been developed into a political philosophy by some of the greatest minds of all time. Despotism, Machiavelli, democracy and constitutional government are just some of the many forms of political systems that have developed throughout history. These famous individuals have all argued about the right mix of democracy and monarchy for their respective nations. Some people would argue that there isn’t enough balance between these ideals, and that societies have become too polarized to move toward any form of polarity.

The democracy in America system is one that is currently under discussion. The Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and the U.S. Bill of Rights all embody the main ideas behind democracy. They describe a country with a government form in which all citizens are allowed to participate and have their say in how that country runs. There are three key elements to this ideal, all of which are necessary for a vibrant democracy. These include freedom, equality, and liberty.

Freedom is necessary for a successful democracy, and is defined by the Declaration of Independence. The United States is not without freedom; however, many feel that it is extremely difficult to exercise this right given the social conditions that prevail in America today. For this reason, they feel that a far better system is necessary to guarantee that everyone is able to exercise their right to vote. For those who believe that American democracy is generally good, it is also important to note that the French have a tradition of democracy which is more decentralized, and has fewer constraints on its citizens than does America.

For those who believe that democracy in America is bad and that a more centralized system is needed to guarantee a level of equality, they should consider the observations of Gustave de Mably. In his book, “Social Problems of Urban Residents”, he discussed the fact that America has a poor performance rating when it comes to economic prosperity. Many citizens of the United States live in extreme poverty. They have relatively weak educational qualifications, and are saddled with high levels of debt. This dearth of personal equality is what makes the political life of America problematic, and has been the cause of much despair and rebellion.

Those who believe that a democratic revolution is inevitable and necessary because of the way the American people are treated by the government, or the lack of fundamental freedoms in the United States, need to look at the way in which the Chinese communist party has gained power. Their system of oppression has kept the people in check, and despite any kind of international observation, the people of China are happy to live in a society where their freedom of speech is protected, and they enjoy overall prosperity. They do not enjoy widespread violence, and yet they seem to have a high level of national happiness despite the fact that freedom of speech is severely restricted, and political crimes are widespread. In short, the Chinese people are not experiencing a ” democracy ” in America – they are experiencing a socialism.

The greatest threat to democracy in America is not a revolution, but rather the continued existence of a form of slavery, known as capitalism, with its ability to create both wealth and vast unearned wealth for a select few. A cursory glance at history would seem to bear this fact out. The capitalists have always needed an obedient masses who have the capacity to produce the goods that they desire. The individuals who have been able to attend to this need have always been seen as backwards, and this group of self-interest politicians we call the politicians. In short, the interests of the slaveholder are always more important than those of the democracy, and the United States, much like any other country, was created by and for the people, and only the people.

What Is Economic Freedom And Political Freedom And How Are They Related?

Freedom, in general, is the power to act or make changes without constraint. Something is free if it is not constrained in the state of its existence and can evolve freely. That is why people say things are free: they mean that whatever is being endowed is at its disposition to be used. The power of freedom thus stems from the fact that it is compatible with the fact that humans are rational creatures and capable of altering whatever their minds decide.

People’s freedom is most frequently associated with the individual liberty of speech and press, which includes freedom of expression as a right, and an interest in being able to hold certain views about, and to criticize, government and other public institutions, and a willingness to accept different opinions, even contradictory ones, about important issues, such as political party politics or religion. However, these freedoms also extend to a broader range of actions. Freedom of speech and press also give way to protection against defamation and other defamation as well as other actions aimed to intimidate or defame another individual. A person’s freedom of action, therefore, encompasses not only physical freedoms but also mental freedoms as well. This is where the concept of public health and freedom of health comes into play.

Public health is one instance of freedom of action that stems from the desire to maintain good human welfare. Good public health is necessary to the efficient management of the economy and the well-being of the people. For this end, people have a right to seek advice and be provided with information that they may need in making good decisions for themselves and their families. Also, the right to freedom of thought and freedom of speech guaranteed by the constitution and other legal provisions are necessary to safeguard the welfare state and guarantee the equal rights of citizens regardless of their race, tribe, color, sex, religion, or sex, and to ensure social equality.

Political freedoms, on the other hand, are the opposite of economic freedoms because economic freedom is rooted in economic prosperity. For this reason, human beings have been willing to fight for the economic freedom, which they believe is necessary to ensure their liberty and freedom. Also, unlike economic freedom, a person’s freedom of action and freedom of speech are tied tightly together. Consequently, when a person thinks that he or she is being attacked by another for his or her beliefs or opinions, he or she can take measures to protect those freedoms by going to the court and filing for a lawsuit.

Freedom of speech and press is another aspect of economic freedom that has become a cause cockey between economic freedom and political freedom. Because the press is an institution that promotes freedom of speech and dissemination of information, those who cannot find the courage to speak out for their freedoms face severe repercussions. For this reason, even if the press enjoys a free press charter, some areas have made it a requirement for any citizen to register as a reporter before covering a story. Also, laws against defamation and violence are designed to protect the vulnerable from the defamation and physical violence that may be directed at them.

In today’s world, people’s freedom of action and freedom of speech are being threatened by violence and intolerance. Therefore, human rights activists work constantly on improving the conditions for freedom of speech and press along with other freedoms in the political arena. The advancement of civil liberties ensures that people enjoy greater levels of freedom, which is necessary for freedom to flourish. When more people have the freedom to express themselves, politics no longer threaten the individual but enrich his or her life.

democracy and Corruption

The term “democracy” has many meanings. One commonly used meaning is representative government. A form of government where one segment has a preponderance of votes. An election to govern a representative government is normally called a plebiscitary election. A government led by a democracy, also known as a constitutional democracy, is described as a constitutional democracy.

Within a democratic political system, the institutions of the democracy ensure that each citizen has the opportunity to participate in the political process and have their say in how the country is run. This provides citizens with a sense of involvement and a voice in how they are governed. Each political party in a democracy may hold a manifestos or a presidential election.

The most famous form of democracy is modern liberal democracy. These are named after the French Revolution where a group of citizens banded together to remove the absolute power of the King and institute a form of democracy in place of absolute rule. This group set up institutions that were considered to be democratic. In most modern liberal democracies, freedom of speech and press is protected. The rule of law is highly developed and the political system is controlled by a constitution. Privacy is not an issue as people can freely criticize government policies without repercussions.

In contrast, there is a form of democracy known as authoritarian democracy, which has a strong centralized executive authority, and is ruled by a party that is ruled by a bureaucracy. Industrial society has greatly increased in developed nations over the last century and this has brought with it the need for higher wages, more leisure time, and more opportunities. As these opportunities have become available, there has been a growing gap between the haves and have nots. In most cases, the haves outnumber the have nots in wealth and income levels, so a division of wealth has resulted.

Many have labeled modern-day liberal democracy as dangerous because it gives too much power to the individuals. Others have said that a democratic polity would likely fail because it cannot provide social services or protect its citizens from major threats. A few, such as Jean Loriot, have argued that liberal democracy is inherently prone to corruption. For this reason, he has classified contemporary democratic societies into three groups, each with varying levels of corruption. Group one, which includes many western European and North American countries, is considered to be the world’s democracy and enjoys strong levels of economic prosperity, technological advancement, and social welfare.

Group two, consisting of eastern European and Latin American countries, consists of relatively poor, uneducated, and corrupt societies. The third grouping, which is comprised of Asia-Pacific nations, consists of relatively wealthy, advanced civilizations, yet has one of the highest rates of infant mortality and poverty. Based on these definitions, we could argue that democratic societies are not inherently incapable of providing social services or protection to their citizens. However, in order for us to evaluate the level of democracy in different societies, we must apply the criteria suggested in this article to determine what exactly democracy means.

Criminal Justice Degrees

The law is primarily law developed and imposed by governmental or social institutions to control behavior, having its precise legal definition again a matter of long-standing debate. It is often alternatively defined as an art and science of civil law. Some philosophers define law as a human construct based on rational reflection on right and wrong. According to this view, law is a purely rational concept, which does not reflect any underlying moral or ethical principles. However, most other philosophers hold that law has both rational and non-re rational aspects.

In a further discussion, the term ‘law’ is used to refer to the set of rules or principles that govern conduct in the legal sphere. This includes legislation, norms, and duties just like any other set of rules. It is further divided into two main areas, ethical law and criminal law. The former deals with rules that affect individual liberty and moral right, while the latter deals with rules that affect the State and its authority, enforcing obedience to the law.

In addition to these differences, there are also significant temporal differences. In the United States, there are three major bodies of law: Federalism, Civil Law, and Common Law. Federalism refers to the separation of powers within the State. For instance, in the case of Congress, the branches of government are separated from one another so that each branch has the prerogative of acting in its own interest. Civil law, on the other hand, refers to disputes over private domains such as land, property, and business that are not covered by common law jurisdictions. Common law jurisdictions include cases such as those that deal with takings, property rights, corporate law, and criminal law.

For purposes of this article, we will be focusing on the last category of laws – criminal law. Criminal law encompasses crimes against the state, private citizens, or society in whole. It is one of the most important categories of law because crime can and does have a wide effect on society. When crimes are committed, the State is justified in using its police power to apprehend those responsible for the crime and bring them to justice. The criminal justice system is integral to the operation of our legal system. For this reason, it is important for students to have a clear understanding of what this category of law entails.

Within the realm of criminal justice, there are two basic classifications of wrongs: Misdemeanors and Felonies. Misdemeanors are less severe offenses and involve the violation of a law that is not itself a felony, but has a reputation for being regularly violated (e.g., a white-collar crime). Misdemeanors are commonly punished by reduced fines, probation, community service, or incarceration. For example, the offense of rape is not a felony, but the word “rape” is often used as an additional or definitive verb, implying the possibility of such a crime, and thus the punishment.

The second, and arguably the most important, category of criminal law is that between crimes against society and crimes which are morally wrong but do not meet the above distinctions. These fall under what is known as the gray area. Gray area includes a broad range of crimes and behaviors, including murder, theft, child molestation, sex crimes, domestic violence, graffiti, and driving under influence. Although the definition of the gray area varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, earning a doctoral degree in criminal justice is usually required if you want a career in the legal field after law school.